Eli & Fur – Night Blooming Jasmine (Rodriguez Jr. Remix)

It’s a quarter past midnight
On the street where you’re roaming
With the scent of your cigarette
The scent of a love so cold
And I’m twisting all through the night
But every time we touch
All that’s left is night blooming jasmine and the songs that are leading me home
All that’s left is night blooming jasmine and the scent of your cigarette

It’s a quarter past midnight
On the street where I go
With a shape of your silhouette
Cos you never left my mind In that empty bar
We were pacing all through the night
Still everytime we touch
All that’s left is night blooming jasmine and the songs that are leading me home
All that’s left is night blooming jasmine and the shape of your silhouette

TPB Menon and Sat Pal Khattar

VETERAN TRIALS

These days, we are constantly reminded of the need for resilience and fortitude in the face of Covid-19.  For veteran lawyers Mr TPB Menon and Mr Sat Pal Khattar, it did not take a global pandemic to turn their lives upside down.  At an age when most of their peers were focused on their studies, they had to shoulder the added responsibility of being head of their households while grappling with the demands of law school. Their stories, taken from excerpts of their oral history interviews with SAL, are inspirational in these difficult times.

V

Mr TPB Menon was studying for his HSC (Higher School Certificate, equivalent to today’s A’ levels) when his father was diagnosed with cancer. “The doctor told me, your father has only got three months to live…I didn’t tell my mum. I think it would have finished her.” 

Within six months of his father’s passing, the family had to vacate the staff quarters at the Bukit Timah campus where the elder Mr Menon had been Supervisor of Works at Raffles College. They would live in rented premises for two years before Mr Menon purchased a $19,000 semi-detached house with money left from his father’s university provident fund.  “The first day we moved in, we only had a footstool and we all had to sit on the floor.”

At just 19, Mr Menon became head of the household. “My mother was only 37,” and he had three other younger siblings. “I don’t know how I did it. I didn’t fall sick but I was very, very thin.” He would wake up at 5am, drive his siblings to school, do the marketing on his way back before heading home to change and go to university. At 12.30pm, he would pick his siblings from school, go home for lunch and then he was back at university for lectures in the evenings and studies at the library until 10pm.

c

Above: The first batch of students at the University of Malaya Department of Law. Addressing the moot court is a young TPB Menon who later made his mark in trust litigation. Courtesy: Scales of Gold: 50 Years of Legal Education at the NUS Faculty of Law

The final year of law school was the hardest. “I had a heavy combination of subjects which meant that I had to work doubly hard.” But money was also running out. “My sister and brother were poised to go to university. So being the eldest, I had to worry about money which at that stage shouldn’t be the case… [At] night, I gave tuition and used to earn a little bit of money writing articles for [a friend at] The Straits Times.” Giving up was not an option; after all, Mr Menon recalled that it was his father’s dying wish that all the children complete their university studies. 

Unlike Mr Menon, Mr Sat Pal Khattar’s father had no wish for his son to further his education beyond the Senior Cambridge (equivalent to today’s ‘O’ levels). “My father had decided that he needed help in his tiny business. And I had very little say. So I sold sports goods for my father, and travelled to all the smaller towns in Malaya, Sarawak, Brunei and Sabah.”

“When I wanted to do law, I had to discuss with him to say that I would need only about three hours a week off. I managed to persuade the faculty to put all my tutorials after office [hours]. But lectures were not arranged [that way] for me. So quite often I used to rush to a lecture [and] rush back and sell sports goods.” He would also spend his university holidays travelling to different parts of Malaysia for the business. “My obligation to the family business was unaffected by the fact that I was doing law,” said Mr Khattar, who lost his mother as a child. Just before his second-year exams, his father died of a massive heart attack. It was a double whammy for him. “The second-year exams were crucial because if you did not get through, you had to leave the faculty.”

Despite his father’s unexpected passing, Mr Khattar got the best results that year and even nabbed a book prize. Law studies aside, the young man was also saddled with the full responsibility of running his father’s business and looking after an extended family which included his grandmother, his sister, step-mother and her three children. 

“Everybody was interested in getting the best [results] but I was more interested in getting a job because, for me, a job was the most important thing,” recalled Mr Menon. The convocation ceremony for this first batch of local law graduates was held in Kuala Lumpur but given their dwindling finances, his family couldn’t afford to attend. “My mother wanted to see her eldest son graduate but we couldn’t afford for all of us to stay in the hotel. So I had to go there all by myself.”

TPB2

Above: Mr TPB Menon’s graduation photo. He is standing in the last row, fourth from the right. Courtesy: Scales of Gold: 50 Years of Legal Education at the NUS Faculty of Law

THE DRAW OF THE LEGAL SERVICE

The Legal Service offered the best opportunity to get a job straight away after graduation. Unfortunately, Mr Menon recalled the day when he was told that his application was rejected. “It was my birthday… I even remember the shirt I wore.  It was a short-sleeved blue shirt with stripes. That was the blackest day, I thought it was a disaster.” 

When he broke the news to this mother that he would not have a salary for another year, “I still remember the words my mother said.  She told me, ‘Son, when one door closes, there’s always another window that opens.’” 

Mr Eric Choa opened that window for Mr Menon when he agreed to take him as a pupil for six months on the condition that there will be no pay and that he would have to leave at the end of the period.  However, after just three months, Mr Choa offered Mr Menon a job at his firm. Despite getting offers of higher pay later, Mr Menon chose to remain with Mr Choa who would eventually pass him the firm, making him a sole proprietor at a relatively young age.  “I thought to myself and I said, ‘What is more important? Is money more important or my relationship with Eric Choa who has taught me the ropes?’” 

CLIMBING THE RANKS

Unlike Mr Menon, Mr Khattar was not eager for a job in the Legal Service. He was earning a comfortable income from his family’s sports goods business and he had no intention of practising law. “I wanted to go back to university to become a graduate assistant.” 

At the behest of Dr Bashir Mallal, who chided him for wasting his legal education, Mr Khattar decided to join the Legal Service and was appointed a DPP and State Counsel doing criminal work. “I hated it. I was not made for a career prosecuting criminals and murders and rape and stuff like that.”

SPK

Above: Presidential candidate Ong Teng Cheong being greeted by lawyer Sat Pal Khattar at Singapore Conference Hall on nomination day for the first presidential election in 1993. Ministry of Information and the Arts Collection, courtesy of National Archives of Singapore

So when a vacancy in the tax department came up, Mr Khattar decided to make the switch; one that would change his entire career. Within seven years, he would rise to the rank of a superscale officer at an early age of 30. “I was the envy of a lot of people in the Legal Service because nobody below 30 ever got a superscale.  But after a while, I decided that I didn’t want to remain a civil servant all my life.” 

He left the Legal Service to start a one-man practice, Sat Pal Khattar and Company on 1 July 1974. About 15 months later, his classmate Dr David Wong joined him and Khattar-Wong & Partners was born. 

Mr Khattar attributes much of his success to what he calls ‘accidents’.” It was accidental that after I started practice… Graham Hill [who] was not only the leading lawyer in the tax field but the leading civil lawyer in Singapore… ran into some problems… and he gave up practice and went back to the UK. So suddenly, I was a tax practitioner with no other person to compete with, and I had a lion’s share of the tax work from the multinationals as well as from the local community.”

A LIFE IN THE LAW

Mr TPB Menon was among the pioneer batch of 22 law students who graduated from Singapore’s first law faculty in 1961. His former classmate Chan Sek Keong describes him as “the most experienced property and trust lawyer in private practice”.  Mr Menon was senior partner of Oehlers & Choa before it merged with Wee Swee Teow LLP in 1989. He was senior partner of Wee Swee Teow LLP from 1989 to 2000 and is now a Consultant at the firm. He was President of Law Society from 1980-83 and was awarded the Society’s highest honour – the CC Tan Award in 2004. Listen to his interview here.

Mr Sat Pal Khattar graduated with an Honours degree in Law from the University of Singapore in 1966 and started his career as a Deputy Public Prosecutor and State Counsel at the Attorney General’s Office. This was followed by a shift to the Inland Revenue Office as a Legal Officer. He founded Khattar Wong & Partners, one of the largest law firms in Singapore. After retiring from law practice in 2000, he established Khattar Holding, a private investment firm. Since the early 1990s, Mr Khattar has been investing in India, and this experience has helped him promote and support bilateral trade and investments between Singapore and India. He has served on many civic bodies in Singapore in various capacities and has been honoured at the May Day Awards on several occasions. He was the first resident in Singapore to receive the Padma Shri Award from the Indian government. Listen to his interview here.

The Development of The Singapore Legal System is a joint oral history project by SAL’s Legal Heritage Committee and the Oral History Centre, National Archives of Singapore.

Law firms take more extensive cuts amid unprecedented crisis

TUE, AUG 11, 2020 – 5:50 AM

nz_law_110833.jpgSeveral well-known law firms in Singapore, including one of the Big Four, have imposed pay cuts across the board – a move not seen in previous crises.  PHOTO: ST FILE 

Singapore

SEVERAL well-known law firms in Singapore, including one of the Big Four, have imposed pay cuts across the board – a move not seen in previous crises.

Dentons Rodyk and Big Four firm WongPartnership are among the largest law firms here that have announced firm-wide wage cuts, with both doing so by stripping out lawyers’ “front-loaded” bonuses.

Local law firms have over the past decade supplemented lawyers’ basic salaries with bonuses that are “front loaded”, or paid out in advance every month.

Lawyers and staff at Dentons Rodyk have had their advance bonuses cut since April this year.

Senior counsel Philip Jeyaretnam, who is the firm’s Asean chief executive and global vice-chair, said the move was “simply about being prudent” in the face of Covid-19.

“By March of this year, it was clear that 2020 was no normal year and so we stopped paying advance bonus from April onwards to all associates and to staff. Naturally, partners, especially senior partners, reduced their drawings the most,” he told The Business Times.

The firm will review the situation at the end of the year and decide how much additional bonus to pay, and to whom to allocate it.

“Some work, especially dispute work, restructuring and refinancing work has actually increased and some people are working harder than ever,” Mr Jeyeretnam pointed out. He also noted that the firm had preserved all jobs and hired 13 practice trainees.

At WongPartnership, lawyers across various seniorities will have their front-loaded bonuses cut by between 5 and 10 per cent from August, with these adjustments “revisited periodically”.

In response to BT’s queries, partner Joy Tan said that Singapore is facing unprecedented economic challenges, with the economy expected to shrink by between 4 and 7 per cent this year.

“The firm has a similar conservative business outlook on the year. While we remain financially healthy, and retrenchment is not an issue for us, we have chosen to adopt prudential measures on pay,” she said.

These paycuts are “not purely prudential belt-tightening measures”, she said, but designed to give the firm flexibility in paying a differentiated bonus to reward the more deserving performers, Ms Tan said.

There are plans to restore the front-loaded bonuses in 2021 or earlier, if the outlook improves.

“We have encouraged our people to not look at this as a cut but as a withholding, in that deserving performers may well still be paid the same amount in bonuses as before, at the end of the financial year,” she said.

Data from London-based legal research firm Chambers and Partners showed WongPartnership and Dentons Rodyk are staffed by about 300 and 200 lawyers, respectively, in Singapore.

A spokesperson from Drew & Napier would only say that the firm has not implemented any pay cuts.

Allen & Gledhill and Rajah & Tann, the remaining two Big Four firms, did not address queries on whether they have implemented such cost-cutting measures.

Local mid-sized firm TSMP Law Corporation had told BT in May that its partners would be taking a 25 per cent cut to “stand in solidarity” with clients.

While the firm has not implemented any pay cuts firm-wide since then, it will be adjusting starting pay for newly qualified lawyers down by 8 per cent, for those getting called in August.

“If the situation worsens, however, the firm could take further action to restructure all our lawyers’ pay,” joint managing partner Stefanie Yuen Thio told BT.

“We would try to make this a temporary cut, however, with an intention to reinstate pay levels in a year or two. The work will come back. Law firms just need to survive the cash flow crunch until that happens. That’s why we decided to do an early pay cut for the partners to manage our cash flow more prudently.”

There are whispers of concern over retrenchments later if business activity continues to languish, reflecting the severe economic impact from a global pandemic on the professional services sector.

Some law firms are reducing work hours or encouraging lawyers to go on sabbaticals, moves that are fairly uncommon in the legal sector here, even in past economic downturns.

When BT reported in May on law firms tightening their purse strings, most were doing so by freezing increments, hiring, or slicing partners’ profit distributions.

But recent moves seem more extensive, impacting junior associates and even staff who are not lawyers.

An associate at a Big Four firm expects the firm to be harder hit due to its large volume of corporate work.

A junior lawyer at another local, established law firm said that his firm has also implemented a cut of 10 per cent to associates’ pay. Partners at the firm were said to have taken a larger cut, but the proportion was not disclosed, said the lawyer, who spoke to BT on the condition of anonymity.

“(The management) announced the cuts a month before circuit breaker. They sent an e-mail and said that times are challenging … If it deteriorates, the cuts could get worse,” he said.

TSMP’s Ms Yuen-Thio said that during past economic downturns, the legal sector saw hiring slow and pay increments moderated. Because the economic pain tended to be concentrated in certain geographical areas, lawyers could also find jobs in countries that were less impacted.

But Covid-19 has dealt a different hand.

“The virus has been agnostic about political leanings and geography, and with most business sectors badly affected, the law firms that support them have started to feel the pinch,” she said.

Lee Shulin, co-founder and director at Ansa Search, pointed out that firms with strong litigation, disputes, as well restructuring and insolvency practices are more resilient.

“They have greater leverage when the economy takes a turn,” she said.

International law firms, including those with a presence in Singapore, appear to be the ones who are taking more drastic measures,

US outfit Reed Smith has rolled out several rounds of austerity cuts, which saw pay cuts across all levels – including a 40 per cent reduction in monthly draws by equity partners – as well as layoffs in the firm’s largest office in London.

London-headquartered Norton Rose Fulbright has asked staff to volunteer reducing their working hours by up to 20 per cent until next April. It took a similar move in the immediate aftermath of the global financial crisis.

The firm’s Europe, Middle East and Asia arms are also deferring partner distributions and staff salary increments for the foreseeable future.

Checks on the Law Society’s careers portal still show a number of mid-sized and smaller law firms, such as Yeo & Associates and Eldan Law, looking to expand their litigation practices.

But recruiters said they have also been receiving a larger number of queries of late particularly from junior lawyers, with some considering leaving practice to serve as in-house legal counsels.

“Their workload has remained largely the same, if not more, and would be understandably disgruntled in having to take a pay cut despite their efforts,” said Clement Tan, a senior consultant at Space Executive.

“Some see the pay cut as a time to reassess where they are, becoming more open to considering an alternative career in-house or with another firm.”