When I joined the service, my first permanent secretary was Hon Sui Sen. When he died in harness, in the mid-1980s, he was the Minister for Finance, and I was one of the permanent secretaries in that ministry. He was my boss for most of the intervening 25 years. He was, without doubt, the best reporting officer I had, a perception that most of my contemporaries who served under him shared. I have tried to apply his template of leadership and management in the many areas where I have worked, albeit with nowhere near as much success.
Nonetheless, I was fortunate to observe that template at close hand and to try to replicate it. I suppose that is how traditions in an institution are built, and a culture of good governance is fostered. Like most good things in life, the concept is deceptively simple, the application a matter of discipline. It is a distillation of principles and practices that have stood the test of time. But for success, the environment has to be wholesome.
The example must come from the top. If that vital element is missing, good deeds below decks may ameliorate the situation, but cannot make up for that critical deficiency. So, what was it in Hon Sui Sen’s leadership style that many of my contemporaries and I admired?
Without doubt, integrity—not just moral, but intellectual. Some will say, “What is so unusual about integrity?” Surely, leaders must have integrity to get to their lofty position. Integrity is more than keeping the hands off the till, although scary examples in recent times suggest that some leaders cannot even refrain from doing that. Consider Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, Parmalat.
Then, there are shades of grey—ethical issues that do not transgress any law except one’s sense of honour and straight dealing. But intellectual integrity goes further than that. It is a matter of quietly defending your position no matter how unpopular it may be to the institution.
A second outstanding quality of Mr Hon was his ability to delegate a large measure of authority to his subordinates, to leave them to run their show, and to avoid breathing down their necks. Of course, they were held accountable for their actions, and Mr Hon was no namby-pamby when it came to disciplining people. Yet, he would always support subordinates who made an honest error, and did not shield himself by assigning blame to others. He took the rap for anything that went wrong in his bailiwick.
You may well imagine that such behaviour comes from enormous self-confidence, without arrogance. It is the measure of a person’s generosity of spirit, modesty, the even tenor of his ways, and a forgiving nature. At the same time, while Mr Hon was prepared to defend his officers and ministry, he was respectful of authority, following the age-old principle of rendering unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s.
A third, key attribute was his skill in drawing out ideas from his officers through a heuristic approach, gently challenging assumptions, and urging thinking out of the box. He got the best out of his people.
That, in a nutshell, is what characterises an outstanding leader and manager. Textbooks, management consultants, workshops, seminars, and executive courses, all play a role in the effort to learn about management and leadership; or, if you like, in the context of present-day Singapore, creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. But above all, keep the eyes and ears open. There are always many examples of outstanding leadership around.
The attributes of good leadership are eternal and universal. They stem from traditional norms embellished by sound management-practices that have evolved and been refined with experience.
The starting point is clarification of the mission, based on a realistic assessment of the environment, and courage in pushing the envelope. Strengthen the organisation, paying particular attention to how people are managed and endowed with authority. Encourage openness, do not fear dissent within limits, and allow those now-cherished attributes of creativity and innovation to flourish. Finally, define and know your customer, and respond to his legitimate needs.
When I look back on the institutions in which I have worked, I do not see any fundamental difference in the package of leadership and management skills that contributes to success. Of course, each institution is unique, with its own mission and culture. An adaptable leader can, within reason, certainly function in many environments. The civil service, or at least the administrative service, testifies to that dictum. The key to successful leadership lies in the individual, the experiences he has been exposed to, the environment. Management gurus, seminars, consultants, and so forth, may be useful tools. They cannot substitute for the real thing.
~ JY Pillay, Reflections of a Recycled Bureaucrat, April 2004